Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges

WILEY WHARTON v. THE STATE.

Assault to Rape — Aggravated Assault — Statement of Facts — Bills of Exception.

In the absence of a statement of facts or bills of exception, the charge submitted to the jury being sufficient under the indictment, the judgment below is affirmed.

HAWKINS, JUDGE.

Upon trial under an indictment charging assault with intent to rape appellant was convicted of an aggravated assault, and his punishment assessed at a fine of $100, and imprisonment in the county jail for one year.

The record is before us without statement of facts or bills of exception. Many alleged errors are set up in the motion for new trial, none of which can be considered by us in the absence of verification by bills of exception and in the absence of a statement of the facts. The charge submitted to the jury only the issue of aggravated assault, and is applicable to a case provable under the indictment. In the condition of the record we must presume the trial was regular, and that the evidence was sufficient to support the verdict.

The judgment of the trial court is affirmed.

Affirmed.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

WHARTON v. THE STATE
(Apr 26, 1922)