Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Advocates
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Advocates
Judges

Ex parte AVONDALE MILLS. COKER v. AVONDALE MILLS.

GARDNER, J.

One J. M. Coker received an injury to his right hand in the factory of the Avondale Mills at Pell City, and, according to his contention, lost his entire middle finger and also his thumb. Coker filed his petition in the circuit court of St. Clair county for compensation under the Workmen's Compensation Act (Laws 1919, p. 206). The court, without the consent of the parties, rendered a judgment in favor of petitioner in a lump sum, and this action of the court is assigned as error and argued by counsel in brief.

Construing section 23 of our Workmen's Compensation Act, this court, following the holding of the Minnesota court in State v. District Court, 134 Minn. 16, 158 N.W. 713, L.R.A. 1916F, 957 (from which state our statute was largely borrowed) held that the amounts of compensation payable periodically may be commuted to a lump sum payment under the provisions of this section, only by consent of the parties. Woodward Iron Co. v. Bradford, 206 Ala. 447, 90 So. 803. The judgment rendered therefore was erroneous.

There are some few questions, a consideration of which we pretermit, and have concluded, under circumstances here presented, which need not be detailed, the judgment for the error indicated should be reversed, and the cause remanded to the trial court.

Writ of certiorari is awarded, and the cause reversed and remanded.

ANDERSON, C. J., and SAYRE and MILLER, JJ., concur.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

EX PARTE AVONDALE MILLS
(Oct 26, 1922)