AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges

JARED H. MILLER, Petitioner, v. SUPERIOR COURT OF LOS ANGELES COUNTY et al., Respondents.

CRAIG, J. —

The petitioner asks for a writ of prohibition to enjoin the respondent superior court from proceeding further in an action by which Frank M. Kelsey, as special administrator of the estate of Mary Moore Miller, deceased, brought suit to recover a safe and its contents from Jared H. Miller and Cecil A. Miller. The action sought to be enjoined is an ordinary claim and delivery suit. The complaint therein alleges that the safe and its contents were the property of Mary Moore Miller during her lifetime, and were then in the possession of petitioner herein, and that since her death he has continued to hold the same from the plaintiff in that action.

[1] It is one of the duties of the special administrator to recover and take charge of the property of an estate which he represents and he has full authority to maintain any action necessary to the performance of this duty. (Code Civ. Proc., secs. 1415, 1582; In re Welch, 106 Cal. 427 [39 P. 805].)

The petition for the writ is denied.

Finlayson, P. J., and Works, J., concurred.

A petition to have the cause heard in the supreme court, after judgment in the district court of appeal, was denied by the supreme court on December 11, 1922.

All the Justices present concurred.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

MILLER v. SUPERIOR COURT
(Oct 14, 1922)