Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Attorney(S)
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Attorney(S)

D.C. BURGER v. JOHN A, TATHAM ET AL. T. C. CRISP ET AL.

Appeal and Error — Judgment Vacated — Reference — Pleadings — Procedure.

Held, an order by the Superior Court judge holding, upon the facts stated, that the plaintiff could not recover the purchase price of lumber, the subject of the action, but damages alone, and referring the case, permitting amendments to the pleadings, was too drastic and should be vacated; and the cause is remanded to the end that the exceptions filed to the referee's report may be passed upon according to the usual course and practice of the court in such cases, without regard to said order.

Civil action to recover the purchase price of certain lumber alleged to have been manufactured and delivered under a logging and sawmilling contract.

The plaintiff D.C. Burger appealed.

STACY, J.

The record in these consolidated cases is not in shape for us to determine the rights of the parties. At the November Term, 1921, by consent, the two causes were consolidated and referred to J. D. Mallonee, Esq., as referee, under the law appertaining to references. The referee made his report, to which both sides filed exceptions. At the Spring Term, 1922, his Honor, Walter E. Brock, judge presiding, without passing upon all of the exceptions to the referee's report, held that the plaintiff could not sue for the purchase price of the lumber, but that he could proceed only in an action for damages. Thereupon, the parties were given an opportunity to recast their pleadings, and the cause was remanded to the referee for further hearing. The plaintiff contends that this order is tantamount to a judgment as of nonsuit upon his original cause of action, as alleged, and that he is unable to proceed without serious injury to his rights. As now advised, we think the order in question is too drastic, and that it should be vacated. The cause will be remanded, to the end that the exceptions filed to the referee's report may be passed upon according to the usual course and practice in such cases, without regard to the order entered at the Spring Term, 1922.

Remanded with instructions.

(38)

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

BURGER v. TATHAM
(Feb 1, 1923)