Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)

LANHAM v. BOMAR.BATES

March 15, 1923. The opinion of the Court was delivered by

MR. JUSTICE WATTS.Page 486

The order of Judge Sease, appealed from in this case, is affirmed, under the cases of Finley v. Robertson, 17 S.C. 435; Whitesides v. Barber, 24 S.C. 373; Riker v. Vaughan, 23 S.C. 187; Tederall v. Bouknight, 25 S.C. 275; Harrison v. Lightsey, 32 S.C. 293, 10 S.E., 1010; and the more recent case of Bradley v. Calhoun, 116 S.C. 7, 106 S.E., 843. Affirmed.

MR. CHIEF JUSTICE GARY, and MESSRS. JUSTICES FRASER and MARION concur.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

LANHAM v. BOMAR
(Mar 15, 1923)