Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges

R.S. BAXTER v. STATE.

(Syllabus.) Appeal and Error — Dismissal — Acceptance of Parole. When the pardoning power extends clemency, and the same is accepted pending the determination of an appeal, the appeal will be dismissed.

DOYLE, J.

In the information in this case, R.S. Baxter was charged with the murder of one A.C. Ford, alleged to have been committed in Carter county on or about the 15th day of September, 1921, by shooting him with a pistol. Upon his trial the jury found him guilty of manslaughter in the first degree and assessed his punishment at imprisonment in the penitentiary for the term of 20 years. From the judgment of the court, rendered in pursuance of the verdict, on the 24th day of October, 1921, an appeal was taken by filing in this court on April 13, 1922, a petition in error with case-made.

Counsel for plaintiff in error have filed a motion to dismiss the appeal on the ground that a parole has been granted by the Governor and accepted by the plaintiff in error.

Where a plaintiff in error accepts a parole pending the determination of his appeal, he thereby waives the right to have his appeal determined, and, when the attention of this court shall be called judicially to the fact that a parole has been granted and accepted, his appeal will be dismissed. Odom v. State, 8 Okla. Cr. 540, 129 P. 445.

It is therefore adjudged and ordered that the appeal herein be dismissed, and the cause remanded to the district court of Carter county.

MATSON, P.J., and BESSEY, J., concur.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

BAXTER v. STATE
(Jun 14, 1923)