Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
  • Harwell G. Davis, Atty. Gen., and Lamar Field, Asst. Atty. Gen., for the State. There was no prejudicial error in overruling defendant's motion to exclude the argument of the solicitor. Childress v. State, 86 Ala. 86, 5 So. 755; Cross v. State, 68 Ala. 476; Olden v. State, 176 Ala. 6, 58 So. 307; Sharp v. State, 193 Ala. 28, 69 So. 122; Lide v. State, 133 Ala. 50, 31 So. 953; Jackson v. State, 136 Ala. 25, 34 So. 188; Brown v. State, 121 Ala. 11, 25 So. 744; Blalock v. State, 8 Ala. App. 349, 63 So. 26; Dollar v. State, 99 Ala. 236, 13 So. 575. Pinkney Scott, of Bessemer, for appellee. In support of the holding of the Court of Appeals, counsel cites the authorities cited in that opinion.
Judges
  • PER CURIAM.
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Click here to upload
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
  • Harwell G. Davis, Atty. Gen., and Lamar Field, Asst. Atty. Gen., for the State. There was no prejudicial error in overruling defendant's motion to exclude the argument of the solicitor. Childress v. State, 86 Ala. 86, 5 So. 755; Cross v. State, 68 Ala. 476; Olden v. State, 176 Ala. 6, 58 So. 307; Sharp v. State, 193 Ala. 28, 69 So. 122; Lide v. State, 133 Ala. 50, 31 So. 953; Jackson v. State, 136 Ala. 25, 34 So. 188; Brown v. State, 121 Ala. 11, 25 So. 744; Blalock v. State, 8 Ala. App. 349, 63 So. 26; Dollar v. State, 99 Ala. 236, 13 So. 575. Pinkney Scott, of Bessemer, for appellee. In support of the holding of the Court of Appeals, counsel cites the authorities cited in that opinion.
Judges
  • PER CURIAM.
See more information ...
Smart Summary

Ex parte STATE, ex rel. DAVIS, Atty. Gen. TYLER v. STATE.

PER CURIAM.

The court is of the opinion, and so holds, that so much of the argument of the solicitor as was made reversible error by the Court of Appeals should not have reversed the judgment of the trial court under the case of Olden v. State, 176 Ala. 6, 58 So. 307. The certiorari is accordingly awarded, and the judgment of the Court of Appeals is reversed, and the cause is remanded to said court for further action in conformity with this opinion.

Writ awarded and reversed and remanded.

All the Justices concur.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.
Try AI Pro free for 7 days Upgrade to AI Pro

Comments

TYLER v. STATE
(Jun 28, 1923)