Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges

ANGLO-CALIFORNIA TRUST CO. et al., Respondents, v. OAKLAND RAILWAYS (aCorporation) et al., Defendants; OAKLAND RAILWAYS (a Corporation),Appellant.

THE COURT.

The motion to dismiss the appeal on the ground that the attorney who signed the notice of appeal and prepared the transcript was not the attorney of record and that there had been no substitution of attorneys is granted on the authority of Harrigan v. Bolte, 67 Cal. xxi [8 P. 184].

On August 3, 1923, the supreme court modified the foregoing order as follows:

THE COURT.

Application to modify order of dismissal herein by providing that the dismissal is without prejudice to another appeal. Inasmuch as the appeal was dismissed because of lack of authority of attorney to file notice of appeal, therefore, in effect, no notice of appeal whatever has been filed, the order heretofore made is modified to provide that the dismissal is without prejudice.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

ANGLO-CALIFORNIA T. CO. v. OAKLAND RYS
(Jul 2, 1923)