Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges

CHAMNESS et al. v. SPECKMAN et al.

Commissioners' Opinion, Division No. 5.

Opinion by PINKHAM, C.

This is an appeal from the action of the district court of Okmulgee county, Okla., in rendering judgment in favor of the defendants in error. The cause was duly reached for hearing upon the docket of this court, submitted and assigned for the preparation of an opinion. Upon an examination of the record it appears that neither party has filed a brief in the case, although the time for so doing has long since expired.

In these circumstances, the appeal of the plaintiffs in error must be dismissed for want of prosecution.

By the Court: It is so ordered.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

CHAMNESS v. SPECKMAN
(Jul 24, 1923)