Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges

JOE PARKS v. STATE.

(Syllabus.) Appeal and Error — Dismissal Where Appellant Accepts Parole. Where a plaintiff in error accepts a parole pending the determination of his appeal, he thereby waives the right to have his appeal determined, and, when the attention of the court shall be called judicially to the fact that a parole has been granted and accepted, the appeal will be dismissed.

PER CURIAM.

This is an appeal from the district court of Pontotoc county, wherein, on the 28th day of January, 1921, plaintiff in error was convicted of the crime of rape and sentenced to serve a term of 8 years' imprisonment in the state penitentiary. From such judgment of conviction, he has appealed to this court.

The Attorney General has filed a motion to dismiss this appeal upon the ground that, on the 5th day of January, 1923, the Honorable J.B.A. Robertson, Governor of the state of Oklahoma, issued a parole to the said Joe Parks for this offense, and that the same has been accepted by him. A copy of the said parole and acceptance of same are attached to the motion to dismiss the appeal. A motion to dismiss this appeal was served upon counsel for plaintiff in error in the month of April, 1923, and no response has been made thereto.

The motion to dismiss the appeal is sustained upon authority of the following cases: Odom v. State, 8 Okla. Cr. 540, 129 P. 445; Ernst v. State, 17 Okla. Cr. 282, 187 P. 930; Brown v. State, 16 Okla. Cr. 505, 184 P. 912.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

PARKS v. STATE
(Aug 25, 1923)