Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges

CLINKSCALES v. CLINKSCALES.

THOMAS, J.

The courts of chancery have jurisdiction over the custody of children, independent of the statute. It is immaterial how the jurisdiction is invoked; the paramount question is the well being of the infant. Coleman v. Coleman, 198 Ala. 225, 226, 73 So. 473.

In divorce cases, the statute provides for awarding the custody and education of the children of the marriage as may seem right and proper, having regard to the moral character and prudence of the parents, the age and sex of the child. Code, § 3808.

We have carefully considered the evidence, and are of the opinion that the court committed no error in its decree as to awarding the custody of the child. No good purpose will be served by the detailed discussion of the evidence.

The decree of the circuit court, in equity, is affirmed.

Affirmed.

ANDERSON, C. J., and SOMERVILLE and BOULDIN, JJ., concur.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

CLINKSCALES v. CLINKSCALES
(Nov 29, 1923)