AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Attorney(S)
Judges

JACOB LEVINE vs. THE HEGEMAN TRANSFER AND LIGHTERAGE TERMINAL, INCORPORATED, ET AL.

Under § 61 of the Motor Vehicle Act of 1921, a passenger riding in an automobile which is not legally registered, is not prohibited — as the owner is — from recovering damages for an injury sustained by him while the car is being operated on the highways of this State; although prior to the Act of 1917, the prohibition applied equally to passenger and owner.

WHEELER, C. J.

This case was tried with the companion case of Samuel Kaufman against the same defendants. The matters discussed in that case are equally applicable here, with a single exception. The prohibition of recovery for failure to have a motor-vehicle registered is limited to the owner of the vehicle by the provisions of Chapter 400, § 61, of the Public Acts of 1921. Prior to the Act of 1917, the same prohibition applied equally to the operator of the motor-vehicle and the passenger in the motor-vehicle. The present statute does not bar the plaintiff passenger from recovery for the failure of Kaufman, the owner of the motor-vehicle, to have had it registered. Shea v. Corbett, 97 Conn. 141, 147, 115 A. 694.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

LEVINE v. HEGEMAN TRANSFER LIGHTERAGE TERMINAL, INC
(Dec 13, 1923)