Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges

WALTER DAY v. THE STATE.

Selling Intoxicating Liquor — Sufficiency of the Evidence — Statement of Facts.

A so-called statement of facts not agreed to by the attorneys nor approved by the trial judge cannot be considered on appeal; however, if it were considered the evidence is sufficient to support the judgment of conviction.

HAWKINS, JUDGE.

Conviction is for selling intoxicating liquor, two years imprisonment in the penitentiary.

There are no bills of exception in the record. The only contention made by appellant is that the evidence is insufficient to support the conviction. There is upon file what purports to be a statement of facts, which was carefully examined by us before discovering that the same is not agreed to by the attorneys, neither is it approved by the trial judge. In this condition it can not be considered and the case must be treated as though no statement of facts were upon file. If the instrument on file contains the facts they appear sufficient to support the judgment.

The judgment is affirmed.

Affirmed.

[Rehearing denied February 6, 1924. REPORTER.]

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

DAY v. THE STATE
(Dec 19, 1923)