Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges

A. J. OLIVER, Petitioner, v. THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OFCALIFORNIA, IN AND FOR THE CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO, et al.,Respondents.

THE COURT.

This is an application for a writ of mandamus directed to the respondents. An alternative writ was issued by the district court of appeal of the first appellate district, division one, and a peremptory writ denied after hearing, without any written opinion.

Under the rule stated in Burke v. Maze, 10 Cal.App. 206 [ 101 P. 438], we do not grant a transfer unless an error appears upon the face of the opinion. The constitution provides, article VI, section 24, that "In the determination of causes all decisions of the supreme court and of the district courts of appeal shall be given in writing and the grounds of the decision shall be stated."

This provision applies to mandamus proceedings. ( People v. District Court of Appeal, ante, p. 19 [ 222 P. 353].)

The matter is hereby transferred to this court and, in view of the fact that the matter has been considered by the district court of appeal of the first appellate district, division one, the matter is ordered transferred to the district court of appeal of the first appellate district, division one.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

OLIVER v. SUPERIOR COURT
(Jan 25, 1924)