Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Attorney(S)
Judges

HEIDRITTER LUMBER COMPANY, A CORPORATION, RESPONDENT, v. CENTRAL RAILROADCOMPANY OF NEW JERSEY, APPELLANT.

PER CURIAM.

The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion of the Supreme Court.

For affirmance — THE CHANCELLOR, CHIEF JUSTICE, TRENCHARD, KALISCH, BLACK, KATZENBACH, CAMPBELL, LLOYD, WHITE, VAN BUSKIRK, KAYS, JJ. 11.

For reversal — None.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

HEIDRITTER, c., CO. v. CENTRAL RAILROAD CO
(Jan 27, 1924)