Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges

DEAN v. SESSIONS et al.

(Syllabus.)

Appeal and Error — Absence of Answer Brief — Reversal.

Where the plaintiff in error has duly filed and served brief in compliance with the rules of the Supreme Court, and defendant has neither filed brief nor offered excuse for failure so to do, the Supreme Court will not search the record to find some theory upon which the judgment may be sustained; but where the brief filed appears reasonable to sustain any assignment of prejudicial error, the judgment will be reversed.

COCHRAN, J.

Plaintiff in error filed its brief herein on November 1, 1923. No brief has been filed by defendants in error, and although an extension of time was granted to do so, they have not complied nor assigned any reason for failure to do so. Under the rule of this court when the brief of plaintiff in error appears reasonably to sustain the assignments of error, this court will not search the record to find some theory upon which the judgment may be sustained. Following this rule, the judgment of the trial court in this cause is reversed, and the cause remanded, with directions to grant a new trial.

All the Justices concur.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

DEAN v. SESSIONS
(Feb 19, 1924)