Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Attorney(S)
Judges

WILLIAM T. FERNS v. AMERICAN MOORE PEG CO.

To enforce a mechanic's lien under P. S., c. 141, ss. 9, 17, the precept of the writ must describe with reasonable accuracy the property on which the plaintiff claims the lien and also direct the officer to attach the property to preserve the lien.

YOUNG, J.

The court in construing P. S., c. 141, ss. 9 and 17, holds that one to whom s. 9 gives a lien can preserve it by suit, but to do that he must (1) state in his writ the purpose for which the suit is brought, s. 17; (2) describe the property on which he claims the lien with reasonable accuracy, Hill v. Callahan, 58 N.H. 497; and (3) direct the officer to attach it to preserve his lien, Wason v. Martel, 68 N.H. 560. While the plaintiffs stated in their writ that the suit was "brought for the purpose of securing a mechanic's lien," they did neither of the other things the court holds they must do to preserve their lien.

Exception overruled.

All concurred.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

FERNS v. COMPANY
(Apr 1, 1924)