Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges

HARRY H. ZACK v. THE STATE.

Selling Intoxication Liquor — Practice on Appeal.

In the absence of bills of exception, the testimony in the statement of facts being amply sufficient to support the conclusion of guilt arrived at by the jury, the judgment is sustained.

LATTIMORE, JUDGE.

Appellant was convicted in Criminal District Court No. 2 of Dallas County of selling intoxicating liquor, and his punishment fixed at two years in the penitentiary.

The record is before us without any bills of exception. We have examined the facts as given in testimony and they are amply sufficient to support the conclusion of guilt arrived at by the jury.

No error appearing, an affirmance will be ordered.

Affirmed.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

ZACK v. THE STATE
(Mar 12, 1924)