Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges

JIM McGOWAN v. THE STATE.

Selling Intoxicating Liquor — Sufficiency of the Evidence.

Where upon trial of unlawfully selling intoxicating liquor, the evidence was sufficient to sustain the verdict under a proper charge of the court, the conviction is sustained.

MORROW, PRESIDING JUDGE.

The conviction is for the unlawful sale of intoxicating liquor; punishment fixed at confinement in the penitentiary for one year.

The State's witness Coker testified that in February, 1922, he purchased from the appellant a pint of liquor. There is no testimony controverting this fact. The case was tried upon a plea of guilty. There is nothing in the record attacking the sanity of the accused or otherwise calling in question the propriety of accepting the plea. The charge of the court, the verdict and judgment are regular. The evidence is sufficient to support the verdict.

The judgment is affirmed.

Affirmed.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

McGOWAN v. THE STATE
(May 7, 1924)