Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Attorney(S)
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Attorney(S)

SOLOMON RAISIN, Respondent, v. EDGAR SHOEMAKER, Appellant.

Order affirmed and judgment absolute ordered against appellant on the stipulation, with costs in all courts on the ground that the instrument of December 9, 1919, known as plaintiff's Exhibit 7, was an agreement to give a lease of the premises 926 Prospect avenue and was not a lease; no opinion.

Concur: HISCOCK, Ch. J., CARDOZO, POUND, McLAUGHLIN, CRANE, ANDREWS and LEHMAN, JJ.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

RAISIN v. SHOEMAKER
(Jul 5, 1924)