Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges

DIGGS v. STATE.

SAMFORD, J.

The indictment was in Code form and charged a burglary of a dwelling, or shop, store, warehouse, or other building of E.H. Baker, in which goods, merchandise, or clothing, things of value, were kept for sale, use, or deposit. The evidence for the state was that defendant broke and entered a storehouse of E.H. Baker, but there was no evidence that "things of value, were kept for sale, use, or deposit." The judgment in this case is reversed, on authority of Gilmore v. State, 99 Ala. 154, 13 So. 536; Porter v. State, 17 Ala. App. 550, 86 So. 143; Ashmon v. State, 9 Ala. App. 29, 63 So. 754.

The judgment is reversed, and the cause is remanded.

Reversed and remanded.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

DIGGS v. STATE
(Aug 19, 1924)