TABATSKO v. TABATSKO, N.J., Judgment, Law, casemine.com

Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Report a problem

Citation Codes

Equivalent Citations

citation codes

Attorney(S)

Mr. Thomas R. Armstrong, for the appellant. Mr. Edward A. Kenney, for the respondent.

Judges

PER CURIAM.

Are you a practicing lawyer?

Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.

Upload pleading to use the new AI search

Click here to upload

Cites

Citation Codes

Equivalent Citations

citation codes

Attorney(S)

Mr. Thomas R. Armstrong, for the appellant. Mr. Edward A. Kenney, for the respondent.

Judges

PER CURIAM.

See more information ...

Smart Summary

Please sign up to generate summary.

KALMAN TABATSKO, petitioner-respondent, v. ANNA TABATSKO,defendant-appellant.

PER CURIAM.

The decree will be affirmed, for the reasons stated in the opinion delivered by Vice-Chancellor Fielder in the court of chancery.

For affirmance — THE CHIEF-JUSTICE, TRENCHARD, PARKER, MINTURN, KALISCH, BLACK, KATZENBACH, CAMPBELL, LLOYD, WHITE, GARDNER, VAN BUSKIRK, CLARK, McGLENNON, KAYS — 15.

For reversal — None.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Try AI Pro free for 7 days Upgrade to AI Pro

TABATSKO v. TABATSKO

KALMAN TABATSKO, petitioner-respondent, v. ANNA TABATSKO,defendant-appellant.

Comments