Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Attorney(S)
Judges

In the Matter of the Accounting of JAMES HART, as Committee of the Person and Property of ANNIE HUGGINS, an Incompetent Person.

Per Curiam.

"A party aggrieved may appeal in a case provided by law." (Civil Practice Act, § 557.) The trustees under the will of the incompetent's deceased husband had no legal interest sufficient to authorize an appeal from the order herein when those directly concerned in the determination of the question of the allowance and amount of counsel fee had been given notice of the filing of the account of the committee and of an application for the judicial settlement thereof. An incident to such application would be the allowance of counsel fees. ( Matter of Maxwell, 218 N.Y. 88.)

Respondents were under no duty to protect the rights of the incompetent or the other beneficiaries under the will by taking an appeal from the order of the Special Term to the Appellate Division. ( Isham v. N.Y. Association for the Poor, 177 N.Y. 218, 222.)

The order should be reversed, with costs, and appeal from order of the Special Term to the Appellate Division dismissed, with costs.

HISCOCK, Ch. J., POUND, McLAUGHLIN, CRANE and ANDREWS, JJ., concur; CARDOZO and LEHMAN, JJ., dissent.

Order reversed, etc.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

MATTER OF HART
(Oct 14, 1924)