Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges

SCHMIDT v. UNITED STATES.

PER CURIAM.

The information upon which plaintiff in error was convicted was supported by an an insufficient verification, and a reversal is now sought on account thereof. No objection was made to the information during the trial. It is asserted, however, that upon the motion in arrest of judgment this infirmity was pointed out, and, though such act does not appear of record, we accept this statement.

The decision in Farinelli v. United States (C.C.A.) 297 F. 198, covers the question so fully that we feel further discussion of it is unnecessary. The verification may be and is waived by the accused going to trial without objection. See, also, United States v. McDonald (D.C.) 293 F. 433; Abbott Bros. Co. v. United States, 242 F. 751, 155 C.C.A. 339.

The judgment is affirmed.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

SCHMIDT v. UNITED STATES
(Oct 14, 1924)