Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Attorney(S)
Judges

LEO STEIN, RESPONDENT, v. THE CITY OF LONG BRANCH, APPELLANT.

PER CURIAM.

This is an appeal from a judgment directing the issuance of a peremptory writ of mandamus. Counsel agreed to submit the cause on briefs. Rule 35 of this court, as amended, provides that in all cases to be submitted on briefs, if no brief be filed by the appellant within the time limited (twenty days from the first day of the term), the appeal shall be considered to be abandoned. No brief was submitted on behalf of the appellant within the time so limited or at any other time. The respondent might have moved for a judgment of affirmance, but did not. In the circumstances, the appeal is to be considered abandoned, and it will therefore be dismissed.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

STEIN v. LONG BRANCH
(Oct 20, 1924)