Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges

PAIGE COMPANY OF NORTHERN CALIFORNIA (a Corporation), Petitioner, v. THESUPERIOR COURT OF THE COUNTY OF HUMBOLDT et al., Respondents.

THE COURT.

It appearing upon the face of the petition herein that the petitioner has heretofore applied for a similar writ of prohibition to the district court of appeal, in and for the third appellate district, and that its said application was, on the fourteenth day of November, 1924, denied by said court, the remedy of the petitioner herein was by application for a transfer and hearing in this court upon its aforesaid petition and was not by way of an original application to this court for the writ herein sought. Its said application is for that reason denied.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

PAIGE CO. OF N. CAL. v. SUPERIOR COURT
(Nov 17, 1924)