Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Attorney(S)
Judges

LOUIS GOLDIN, Respondent, v. CHARLES SHANKROFF, Appellant.

PER CURIAM:

Judgment unanimously reversed upon the law, with thirty dollars costs to appellant, and complaint dismissed, with appropriate costs in the court below.

Plaintiff was not a licensed broker at the time of rendering the services in question. Under sections 440-442-1 of the Real Property Law (as added by Laws of 1922, chap. 672) it is made a crime for a person to render services as a broker for compensation without being licensed. By thus violating the law, plaintiff could not obtain a right to commissions. ( Morgan Munitions Co. v. Studebaker Corporation, 226 N.Y. 94, 99.) That plaintiff was not to be paid his commission until title passed, and that prior to that time he procured his license, does not change the situation. He is obliged to have his license at the time he renders the service. ( Ladanyi v. Scavullo, Appellate Term, Second Department, Memoranda Decision, No. 139, Jan. 1924; Roman v. Lobe, Appellate Term, Second Department, Memoranda Decision, No. 353, June, 1924; affd., 213 A.D. 162. See, also, Stake Co. v. Roth, 91 Misc. 45.)

Present: CROPSEY, LAZANSKY and MacCRATE, JJ.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

GOLDIN v. SHANKROFF
(Jan 29, 1925)