Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges

ERNEST ARAIZA v. THE STATE.

Burglary.

No statement of facts nor bills of exception appearing in the record, the judgment is affirmed.

MORROW, PRESIDING JUDGE. —

The offense is burglary; punishment fixed at confinement in the penitentiary for a period of two years.

The record is before us without statement of facts or bills of exception. The indictment appears regular. No fundamental error has been discovered or pointed out.

The judgment is affirmed.

Affirmed.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

ARAIZA v. STATE
(Feb 18, 1925)