APPEAL (11) — NATURE AND GROUNDS — EXISTENCE OF ACTUAL CONTROVERSY. No appeal lies from an order taxing costs.
ASKREN, J.
This is an appeal from an order of the trial court taxing costs in favor of the Georgetown Transfer Company, a corporation, in the second trial of an action the merits of which have been before this court on three different occasions, and are reported in 119 Wn. 154, 205 P. 419; 125 Wn. 563, 216 P. 869; and 130 Wn. 88, 226 P. 262.
At the outset we are met by a motion of respondent to dismiss the appeal. The motion must be granted.
We have held in a long line of decisions that this court will not take jurisdiction of a cause simply to determine who shall pay costs in the controversy. Smith v. Palmer, 38 Wn. 276, 80 P. 460; Wilson v. Fraser, 67 Wn. 347, 121 P. 829; White v. Stout, 72 Wn. 62, 121 P. 917; Vollman v. Industrial Workers of the World, 79 Wn. 192, 140 P. 337; Barber Asphalt Paving Co. v. Hamilton, 80 Wn. 51, 141 P. 199; State v. Furth, 82 Wn. 665, 144 P. 907; Carstens Earles v. Seattle, 84 Wn. 88, 146 P. 381, Ann. Cas. 1917A 1070; Standard Fire Ins. Co. v. Fishback, 86 Wn. 225, 145 P. 945; Holly-Mason Hardware Co. v. Schnatterly, 111 Wn. 29, 189 P. 545.
The appeal is therefore dismissed.
TOLMAN, C.J., MAIN, BRIDGES, and PARKER, JJ., concur.