Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)

HILL SYRUP COMPANY, Plaintiff and Appellant, v. NATIONAL CITY BANK OF SEATTLE, Defendant and Appellant.

ON REHEARING.

MAIN, J.

The evidence in this case does not bring it within the rule of the case of Hill Syrup Co. v. Frederick Nelson, ante p. 155, 233 P. 663. Each case must be determined upon its own record and the facts therein must be supported by the evidence in that particular case. In this case there is no evidence from which it can be found that the Hill Syrup Company was negligent in permitting the practice of Sander in paying his individual debts with corporate funds to begin and continue. It follows, therefore, that the Departmental opinion, Hill Syrup Co. v. National City Bank of Seattle, 129 Wn. 171, 224 P. 578, must be adhered to.

TOLMAN, C.J., MITCHELL, PARKER, BRIDGES, ASKREN, MACKINTOSH, and HOLCOMB, JJ., concur.

FULLERTON, J., dissents.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

HILL SYRUP CO. v. NATIONAL CITY BANK
(Feb 25, 1925)