Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges

PEAVLER ET AL. v. FRANCISCO MINING COMPANY.

MASTER AND SERVANT. — Dependency, under Workmen's Compensation Act, question of fact for Industrial Board. — Under § 38 of the Workmen's Compensation Act, the question of dependency of the parents and brothers and sisters of a deceased employee is a question of fact for the Industrial Board, and its decision will be affirmed where there is some evidence to support it.

REMY, J.

Donald Peavler, twenty-three years of age and unmarried, while in the employment of appellee, lost his life as a result of an accident which arose out of and in the course of his employment. His parents and minor brothers and sisters who survived him filed with the Industrial Board an application for compensation as dependents of the decedent. From an order of the board denying compensation, this appeal is prosecuted. The only question for determination is whether or not under the evidence, the decedent's parents and brothers and sisters were his dependents within the meaning of § 38 of the Workmen's Compensation Act (Acts 1919 p. 158, § 8020u1 Burns' Supp. 1921). The question was one of fact for the Industrial Board. There is evidence to sustain the finding. See, Hoosier Veneer Co. v. Stewart (1920), 76 Ind. App. 1, 129 N.E. 246; Rasin v. Miami Coal Co. (1922), 79 Ind. App. 123, 137 N.E. 529.

Affirmed.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

PEAVLER v. FRANCISCO MINING CO
(Mar 10, 1925)