Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges

CHARLIE WILLIAMSON v. THE STATE.

Receiving and Concealing Stolen Property — No Statement of Facts.

There is no statement of facts in the record, in the absence of which this court cannot review appellants bills of exception to a refusal of a continuance, and of special charges requested and refused.

LATTIMORE, JUDGE. —

Appellant was convicted in Criminal District Court No. 2 of Dallas county of receiving and concealing stolen property, and his punishment fixed at four years in the penitentiary.

The record is before us without a statement of facts. The court overruled appellant's application for a continuance, which action cannot be reviewed in the absence of a bill of exceptions complaining thereof. There are a number of special charges which were requested and refused, the applicability of which could only be determined by us from an examination of the facts, and in the absence of a statement of facts we are unable to appraise the possible error in the refusal of such special charges. There are no formal bills of exception in the record.

Finding no error in the record, the judgment will be affirmed.

Affirmed.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

WILLIAMSON v. STATE
(Apr 1, 1925)