AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Judges

STANDARD FILM SERVICE COMPANY, Appellant, v. ALEXANDER FILM CORPORATION, Defendant, Impleaded with STOLL FILM CO., LTD., and Others, Respondents.

PER CURIAM:

The orders appealed from should be affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, without prejudice to an action at law for such damages as may have been sustained, on the authority of Black v. Vanderbilt ( 70 App. Div. 16); Perrin v. Smith (135 id. 127); Low v. Swartwout (171 id. 725) Gosselin Corp. v. Mario Tapparelli Fu Pietro of America, Inc. (191 id. 580; affd., 229 N.Y. 596), where the second question certified to the Court of Appeals was: "If the complaint herein does not state facts sufficient to constitute a cause of action in equity, is the defendant entitled to judgment sustaining the demurrer and dismissing the complaint?" which the Court of Appeals answered in the affirmative.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

STANDARD FILM SERVICE CO. v. ALEXANDER FILM CORP
(May 1, 1925)