Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
  • J.E. Stryker, of St. Paul,
  • ,
  • A.V. Cushman, of Washington, D.C., for
  • J.H. Lee, of Chicago,
  • , R.F. Steward
  • N.J. Jewett, both of Washington, D.C.,
  • J.Q. Rice
  • M.C. Massie, both of New York City, for
Judges
  • George Ewing Martin
  • Charles Henry Robb
  • Josiah Alexander Van Orsdel
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Click here to upload
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
  • J.E. Stryker, of St. Paul,
  • ,
  • A.V. Cushman, of Washington, D.C., for
  • J.H. Lee, of Chicago,
  • , R.F. Steward
  • N.J. Jewett, both of Washington, D.C.,
  • J.Q. Rice
  • M.C. Massie, both of New York City, for
Judges
  • George Ewing Martin
  • Charles Henry Robb
  • Josiah Alexander Van Orsdel
See more information ...
Smart Summary

George H. WIDNER, Appellant, v. Roy G. TELLIER and William Hoskins, Appellees.

PER CURIAM.

This is one of the series of interferences mentioned in Prather v. Tellier, appeal No. 1742, just decided, ___ App. D.C. ___, 5 F.2d 1010, and was disposed of on the same testimony and with the same result below. As we have adopted the reasoning and conclusion of the Patent Office in appeal No. 1742, it follows that the decision here must also be affirmed. Affirmed.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.
Try AI Pro free for 7 days Upgrade to AI Pro

Comments

WIDNER v. TELLIER
(Jun 1, 1925)