Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges

D.C. HEATH COMPANY v. S.M.N. MARRS, STATE SUPERINTENDENT OF PUBLIC INSTRUCTION.

School Text — Books — Contract — Waiver and Election — Mandamus — Suit Against State — Case Followed.

This case being governed by the rulings in Laidlaw Bros. Inc. v. Marrs, 114 Tex. 561, mandamus is awarded in accordance with the opinion therein which is approved and followed. (P. 574).

MR. JUSTICE PIERSON, delivered the opinion of the court.

Relator seeks a mandamus against respondent to require him to do and perform the ministerial or statutory duties which it has a legal right to have performed in regard to its contract with the State of Texas for the purchase of certain textbooks, to-wit: "Webster's Early European History" and "Webster's Modern European History."

The facts and the issues in this case are, in all material respects, the same as in the case of Laidlaw Brothers, Incorporated, v. S.M.N. Marrs, State Superintendent, opinion delivered June 8, 1925, ( 114 Tex. 561) and were given careful attention in the consideration of that case. For the reasons stated in that case, the writ of mandamus is awarded herein.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

D.C. HEATH CO. v. MARRS
(Jun 10, 1925)