Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Attorney(S)
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Attorney(S)

STATE vs. PHILIP HOWARD.

An indictment for forgery and for uttering a forged instrument. Respondent demurred at the April Term, 1925. His demurrer was overruled and the indictment adjudged good. Respondent excepted. His exceptions were adjudged frivolous and were certified and transmitted to the Chief Justice under Sec. 55, Chap. 82, R. S. No arguments were presented by either side within the time fixed by the statute. An examination of the indictment shows the demurrer to be without merit. The counts are in the form commonly in use and set forth all the essential elements of the offense charged. Entry must be: Exceptions overruled. Judgment for the State.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

STATE v. HOWARD
(Sep 2, 1925)