Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)

JOHN SMITH COMPANY, Respondent, v. WALTER T. HARDIN et al., Defendants, KERR-GIFFORD COMPANY, Appellant.

ON REHEARING.

PER CURIAM

The department opinion in this case may be found in 133 Wn. 194, 233 P. 628. Originally there was involved in this action all of the wheat raised, to wit, both the tenant's two-thirds and the landlord's one-third. Judgment was entered affecting the tenant's two-thirds, but reserving a determination as to the landlord's one-third. That judgment was not appealed from. The judgment here involved is that affecting the landlord's one-third. The last paragraph of the opinion might be construed to be broad enough to include both the tenant's and the landlord's wheat. It should be limited to the latter only. Otherwise, the opinion of the Department is sustained. Appellant will recover costs in this court.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

JOHN SMITH COMPANY v. HARDIN
(Sep 2, 1925)