Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Attorney(S)
Judges

THE UNITED COMMERCIAL BANK v. W. B. WATTS, FLORENCE H. WATTS AND L. M. HAMPTON.

PER CURIAM.

From a careful reading of the record, briefs and examination of authorities, we think the judgment of the court below correct, as follows:

"Upon a consideration of the pleadings and after hearing argument of counsel, the court is of the opinion and so holds that the matter set out in defendant's further answer being noted a counterclaim, is in fact a matter in defense, and not a counterclaim, and that the plaintiffs were not required by law to reply thereto.

"It is therefore ordered, considered and adjudged that the judgment of the clerk refusing to sign said judgment by default final in favor of the defendant, L. M. Hampton upon her alleged counterclaim, be and the same is hereby in all respects affirmed, and it is adjudged that the said defendant is not entitled thereto upon the pleadings."

Affirmed.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

BANK v. WATTS
(Sep 1, 1925)