Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges

BILLINGTON v. STATE. Headnote 1. Intoxicating Liquors, 33 C.J., Section 198.

INTOXICATING LIQUORS. Possession of Jamaica ginger or essence of ginger, put up in accordance with United States Pharmacopoeia, held not violation of statute prohibiting possession of intoxicating liquors.

The mere possession of Jamaica ginger or essence of ginger, put up in accordance with the United States Pharmacopoeia, does not violate our statute, chapter 189 of the Laws of 1918, prohibiting the possession of intoxicating liquors; such articles as Jamaica ginger being recognized as having a medicinal value, and, used as such, may be lawfully possessed. Davison v. Town of Newton, 102 So. 161, 36 A.L.R. 717, cited.

ETHRIDGE, J., delivered the opinion of the court.

The appellant was indicted for unlawfully having in his possession intoxicating liquors in a quantity exceeding one quart, and was put upon trial, convicted, fined, and sentenced to a term in the county jail. The evidence used against him was obtained by means of a search warrant. The appellant owned a drug store, a part of which was occupied by him as a living and sleeping room, and a lot of Jamaica ginger was found in his room, and this was the only intoxicating liquor shown to have been possessed by the defendant.

In Young v. State, and Davison v. Town of Newton (Miss.), 102 So. 161, 36 A.L.R. 717, we held that the statute prohibiting the possession of intoxicating liquors did not apply to articles used as medicines, etc., which might be lawfully possessed for certain purposes, and that the possession of Jamaica ginger, put up in accordance with the United States Pharmacopoeia, recognized as having a proper medicinal value and use, would not sustain a conviction under the statute. See, also Reeves Grocery Co. v. State (Miss.), 103 So. 425, following the above decision. These cases are squarely in point in the case before us, and the judgment and conviction will be reversed, and appellant discharged.

Reversed, and appellant discharged.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

BILLINGTON v. STATE
(Oct 5, 1925)