Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Attorney(S)
Judges

LESTER F. HILYARD ET AL., PROSECUTORS-APPELLANTS, v. KATIE HEINZER,RESPONDENT.

PER CURIAM.

The memorandum filed in the Supreme Court fully states the facts and correctly decides the points properly cognizable in this case. That court intimates (while disclaiming a decision thereon as outside the case) that a landlord's proceeding to dispossess may proceed on the double grounds of expiration of term and failure to pay rent. We agree that this point is outside the case, and so, neither decide it nor express an opinion on it. In other respects we concur in the views expressed by the Supreme Court and affirm the judgment, for the reasons stated in its per curiam memorandum.

For affirmance — THE CHIEF JUSTICE, PARKER, MINTURN, KATZENBACH, LLOYD, WHITE, GARDNER, VAN BUSKIRK, KAYS, JJ. 9.

For reversal — None.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

HILYARD v. HEINZER
(Oct 19, 1925)