STATE v. DUNLAP

Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Report a problem

Citation Codes

Equivalent Citations

citation codes

Docket Number

Nos. 2968, 2969, 2979, 2983, 2993, 3040, 3041.

Attorney(S)

O.O. Askren, of Santa Fe, for appellant Dunlap. Roy Prentice, of Tucumcari, for appellant Stewart. R.A. Prentice, of Tucumcari, for appellant Wells. Fred J. Voorhees, of Raton, for appellant Shedoudy. H.A. Kiker, of Raton, for appellant Cunico. Fitzhugh Fitzhugh, of Clovis, for appellants Bledsoe and Singer. J.W. Armstrong, Atty. Gen., and J.P. Bujac, Asst. Atty. Gen., for the State.

Judges

PER CURIAM.

Are you a practicing lawyer?

Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.

Upload pleading to use the new AI search

Click here to upload

Cites

Citation Codes

Equivalent Citations

citation codes

Docket Number

Nos. 2968, 2969, 2979, 2983, 2993, 3040, 3041.

Attorney(S)

O.O. Askren, of Santa Fe, for appellant Dunlap. Roy Prentice, of Tucumcari, for appellant Stewart. R.A. Prentice, of Tucumcari, for appellant Wells. Fred J. Voorhees, of Raton, for appellant Shedoudy. H.A. Kiker, of Raton, for appellant Cunico. Fitzhugh Fitzhugh, of Clovis, for appellants Bledsoe and Singer. J.W. Armstrong, Atty. Gen., and J.P. Bujac, Asst. Atty. Gen., for the State.

Judges

PER CURIAM.

See more information ...

Smart Summary

Please sign up to generate summary.

STATE, Appellee, v. Clay DUNLAP et al., Appellants. SAME

PER CURIAM.

Each of the defendants in the above-entitled causes was convicted under sections 1 and 2, c. 118, Laws of 1923, which, as we have just held in State v. Armstrong, No. 2947, 242 P. 440, not as yet [officially] reported, are violative of section 18, art. 4, of the Constitution of this state. The judgment in each of said causes must therefore be reversed and remanded, with direction to discharge the accused.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Try AI Pro free for 7 days Upgrade to AI Pro

STATE, Appellee, v. Clay DUNLAP et al., Appellants. SAME

Comments