Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges

SIMPSON v. STATE.

PER CURIAM.

Reference to the opinion of the Court of Appeals ( 106 So. 898) will disclose the fact that it deals with no specific questions of error, states no proposition of law; the sum and substance of the opinion is that there is no error in the record. Under the rule heretofore observed by this court, in cases of this character — i. e., applications for certiorari to the Court of Appeals — the application in this case presents nothing that can be reviewed in this court. Ex parte Minderhout, 195 Ala. 420, 71 So. 91.

Writ denied.

ANDERSON, C. J., and SAYRE, GARDNER, and MILLER, JJ., concur.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

SIMPSON v. STATE
(Jan 21, 1926)