Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Attorney(S)
Judges

MEREDITH W. PALMER vs. DAVID D. DUNCANSON. DAVID D. DUNCANSON vs. MEREDITH W. PALMER.

Evidence, Competency, Book accounts. Practice, Civil, Conduct of trial: finding by judge as to requisites preliminary to admission of evidence.

Where, at the trial of an action, the contents of certain books of account are material and there is evidence that the books cannot be found but that before they were lost the person who kept them caused certain transcriptions to be made therefrom under his oversight and direction, it is not error for the trial judge to admit the transcriptions in evidence for the consideration of the jury.

BY THE COURT.

The question reported is whether a proper basis had been laid for the admission of secondary evidence as to the contents of books of account. The preliminary finding of the judge to the effect that there was such basis was amply justified by testimony which need not be narrated. Smith v. Brown, 151 Mass. 338. Whitney v. Lynch, 222 Mass. 112, 116. The case is distinguishable from Post v. Leland, 184 Mass. 601.

Judgments to be entered on the verdicts.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

PALMER v. DUNCANSON
(Jan 26, 1926)