AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Attorney(S)
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Attorney(S)

In the Matter of the Claim of MATILDA MULLER, Respondent, against HENRY R. APEL, INC., et al., Appellants. STATE INDUSTRIAL BOARD, Respondent.

Order affirmed, with costs; no opinion.

Concur: HISCOCK, Ch. J., POUND, CRANE and ANDREWS, JJ. Dissenting: CARDOZO, McLAUGHLIN and LEHMAN, JJ.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

MATTER OF MULLER v. HENRY R. APEL, INC
(Jan 22, 1926)