Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Attorney(S)
Judges

EDWARD BEAM et al., appellants, v. PATERSON SAFE DEPOSIT AND TRUSTCOMPANY, defendant.

PER CURIAM.

The decree in this case will be affirmed, for the reasons stated by the vice-chancellor. We, however, express no opinion upon the meritorious questions argued, for the reason that they are involved in the appeal now pending in the prerogative court. Should that appeal be adversely decided to the appellants here, an appeal is open to this court for the purpose of review upon the question indicated. For affirmance — THE CHIEF-JUSTICE, TRENCHARD, PARKER, MINTURN, KALISCH, BLACK, KATZENBACH, CAMPBELL, LLOYD, WHITE, GARDNER, VAN BUSKIRK, McGLENNON, KAYS, HETFIELD, JJ. 15.

For reversal — None.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

BEAM v. PATERSON SAFE DEPOSIT TRUST CO
(Feb 1, 1926)