Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Attorney(S)
Judges

JOHANNA VATTER, RESPONDENT, v. WILLIAM T. KALTENBACH, SUPERINTENDENT OFBUILDINGS OF THE CITY OF ELIZABETH, APPELLANT.A.G. CONSTRUCTION COMPANY, RESPONDENT,

PER CURIAM.

These are appeals from judgments of the Supreme Court, overruling demurrers to alternative writs of mandamus and awarding peremptory writs.

The same questions are raised as in Lutz et al. v. Kaltenbach, post, p. 718, of the present term of this court, and the conclusions reached therein are applicable and controlling herein.

The judgments below are affirmed, with costs.

For affirmance — THE CHANCELLOR, CHIEF JUSTICE, PARKER, MINTURN, KALISCH, BLACK, CAMPBELL, WHITE, VAN BUSKIRK, McGLENNON, KAYS, HETFIELD, JJ. 12.

For reversal — None.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

VATTER v. KALTENBACH
(Feb 1, 1926)