Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Attorney(S)
Judges

Gilliam et ux., Appellants, v. Randall.

Appeals — Refusal of preliminary injunction — Equity — Discretion of court — Abuse.

An appellate court will not reverse a decree refusing to issue a preliminary injunction, where the record fails to show an abuse of discretion.

Argued January 26, 1926.

PER CURIAM, February 8, 1926:

This is an appeal from the refusal to issue a preliminary injunction; the record fails to show a plain abuse of discretion, and under such circumstances we do not disturb the decree: for authorities see Lesher v. Gassner Co., 285 Pa. 43.

The decree is affirmed at cost of appellants.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

GILLIAM v. RANDALL
(Feb 8, 1926)