AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)

MARIAN S. JACKSON v. CHICAGO GREAT WESTERN RAILROAD COMPANY. Reported in 207 N.W. 204.

Former decision law of the case.

PER CURIAM.

This case was here before on appeal from an order denying defendant's motion for judgment notwithstanding the verdict or a new trial, 165 Minn. 58, 205 N.W. 689. Upon the going down of the remittitur judgment was entered for the plaintiff in the sum of $10,747.50. This appeal is from that judgment.

The questions presented are the same as those presented on the former appeal and our former decision is followed. The judgment is affirmed and final judgment may be entered in this court.

Judgment affirmed.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

JACKSON v. CHICAGO GREAT WESTERN RAILROAD COMPANY
(Feb 11, 1926)