Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges

OSCAR THOMAS v. THE STATE.

Carrying a Pistol — No Bills of Exception — No Statement of Facts.

There being neither bills of exception nor statement of facts, in the record and no fundamental error being perceived, the judgment is affirmed.

MORROW, PRESIDING JUDGE. —

The conviction is for unlawfully carrying a pistol; punishment fixed at a fine of $100.00.

The indictment appears regular. The record is before us without statement of facts and bill of exceptions. No fundamental error has been perceived.

The judgment is affirmed.

Affirmed.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

THOMAS v. STATE
(Mar 17, 1926)