Divorce — Adultery — Abandonment.
Evidence that a married man, and a woman to whom he had been attentive, occupied adjoining rooms, one of which was a parlor, over night at a summer resort, held to justify a finding of adultery.
A husband was not entitled to divorce on the ground of abandonment, when the separation of the parties was due to his attentions to another woman, which he refused to put an end to, although his wife invited a reunion conditioned on his doing so, and he had by formal agreement consented to the separation.
Decided March 10th, 1926.
URNER, J., delivered the opinion of the Court, affirming the decree, with costs.
Unreported cases.